|
|
- Mining, environment and society: Contribution of the thought of Whitehead to the methodology of assessing the water that can really be mobilized in the Kimberley and Canning Basin, Australia 963 kb | by Vaillant, Philippe | vaillphil@orange.fr |
|
Short Outline |
The Kimberley, one of the last pristine areas in the world, is subject to strong mining and gas pressure. The study, conducted with the Nyikina people and the International Water Centre in Brisbane, raises in a dialogic and organic way the issue of water resources that can be mobilized. |
|
Abstract |
Summary: The Kimberley is one of the last pristine areas in the world and it is subject to strong mining and gas pressure. The study, conducted in collaboration with the Nyikina people (Fitzroy River) and the International Water Centre in Brisbane (IWC) with the support of the Association “Men, Women in the City”, raises in a dialogic (Freire, AIATSIS) and organic (Whitehead) way the issue of water resources that can be mobilized (UNESCO) for industrial needs as well as for plant, animal and human societies. With sustainable development in mind, this issue requires to consider the three induced axes of governance (sovereignty), science (re-enchanted), and land management and care.
Topics: Aboriginal Peoples (UN), governance, the study of mining and gas impacts, Social Impact Assessment (SIA), science, water integrated management (UNESCO WWDR4 Europe DCE 2000 IWC) the science of space planning, organic way of thinking.
Description of the problem: Despite the attractive presentations on the mining companies’ websites, mining leads to the loss of connection to the land and of social ties for indigenous peoples. Moreover pollution generates public health problems. Calculating, assessing and the management of water that can really be mobilized lead inevitably to raise the questions of governance, the implementation of science for impact studies, and practical development of every unique and singular space (eg Nyikina Country). This issue concerns all potential or current operating sites in the world where indigenous peoples live.
Main references: Michel DESHAIES (2007), Augustin BERQUE (AIATSIS 2009 Code of Ethics, UNESCO WWDR4-2010, Indigenous Peoples’ Charter of the UN in 2007, Paolo Freire (1970), Tuhiwai Linda Smith (1988), Joseph GRANGE (Nature 1997, 1999 City) , A.N. WHITEHEAD (Process and Reality, 1929-1995), Handbuch for A .N. Whitehead 2006 DR GRIFFIN (Re-enchantment of science, 1988) P.VAILLANT Geography thesis 2008, W. Twitchett 1995, P.BRACONNIER 2005, V.PACCINI, 2008, P.J. BOREY 2008, Martin PREAUD Ethnology thesis 2009 Roger LAMBERT Geography of the water cycle, PUM 1996, M.McDUFFIE Film Mardoowarra Living Water, 2008.
Method: Methodology of Sustainable Development, to value what already exists, and to weave together induced notions of governance (sovereignty), science (re-enchanted) and land management and care (Aboriginal spirituality). This weaving is enlightened by Whitehead’s organic approach and his definition of ''drops of experience.''
Main results: Proposal for a planning methodology that connects governance, science of impact studies (water) and the culture of the territory (Aboriginal spirituality).
Scope: This method concerns any region in the world where mining operations are implanted. It is useful to articulate the conflicting interests of industrialists, the population, indigenous peoples and ecosystems in a dialogic organizational relationship and a ''win-win'' logic. |
|
Keywords |
|
|
Case Study presented on the ISOCARP Congress 2013: Frontiers of Planning - Evolving and declining models of city planning practice
|
Click to open the full paper as pdf document
|
Click to send an email to the author(s) of this paper
|
|